Each year the Treasury Board undertakes the Public Service Employee Survey (PSES). In 2019, a total of 182,306 employees in 86 federal departments and agencies responded to the survey. Sixty-two percent of public servants responded. 

Year to year, we highlight for you the trends in workplace harassment, wellness, and Phoenix.

Workplace harassment

Harassment in the federal public service persists as a significant and largely unaddressed problem. We are extremely concerned with the high levels of harassment reported by gender diverse people. Twenty-nine percent of gender diverse survey respondents indicate that they had experienced harassment in their workplace.

Reports of harassment overall are declining, but very slowly.

Only 51% of all respondents to the PSES are satisfied with how harassment is resolved in their department.

Psychological wellness

Sixty-one percents of respondents describe their workplace as promoting psychological wellness and actively working to prevent harm to employee psychological health. An increase of 3% from 2018.

This still means that a shocking 39% of public servants do not find that their workplaces are promoting psychological wellness. 

Significantly, 45% of individuals identifying as gender diverse do not describe their workplaces as promoting psychological wellness.

Phoenix

The news with respect to the Phoenix Pay System continues to disappoint.

Four percent more public servants reported being impacted by Phoenix last year than in the previous year. That’s 74% of public servants impacted by Phoenix in 2019.

Over half of respondents to the PSES who experienced a Phoenix issue have not had their issues resolved. Only 44% of respondents report that all pay and compensation issues have been resolved. A 9% improvement from 2018. 

Sixty percent of respondents are not satisfied with the support they receive related to pay issues.

Compare this year’s results with our analysis from 2018.

According to our 2019 membership survey, career development and training (CDT) is a top priority for seventy percent of PIPSC members – in particular, younger members.

That’s why we’re launching a research project to better understand all aspects of career development and training in the federal public service, such as qualifying for a promotion, attending conferences and staying current with new technology. Learn more about career development and training.

The research project will consist of:

• a membership-wide survey
• telephone interviews
• focus groups
• analysis and recommendations
• ongoing member-led solutions development

What will PIPSC research focus on?

In order to effect sustainable change, it is important that PIPSC fully understands the varying issues associated with career development, professional development, and training.

This research will seek to:

• develop a common understanding of the issues related to career development, professional development and training that PIPSC members are experiencing
• enhance our understanding of how members experience issues differently
• develop evidence-based solutions and policy recommendations for our members

About the CDT Task Force

The CDT Task Force will play a key role in consulting members and will help develop the membership survey and other research tools.

Who: A collective of members with unique insight, keen to improve career development and training

Where: Ongoing virtual communication with the possibility of an in-person meeting

When: Active from February to June 2020, with the possibility of the project extending into the fall

Why: To support and advise on the planning, development and implementation of the project

What to expect as a CDT Task Force member

Task force members will review and revise all project components. They will contribute their time on a rotating basis from February to June 2020, with the possibility of the timeframe extending into the fall.

Most task force work will be conducted through email and videoconferencing. Task force members must be available at least once per month to meet virtually. There is also the possibility of an in-person meeting during the project.

The operation of the CDT Task Force is an iterative process – task force members will lead its development. We are eager to accommodate members who may experience barriers to participation.

If you are interested in joining the CDT Task Force, please complete and submit the following application form by February 18, 2020. Members will be chosen and contacted by March 3, 2020.

OTTAWA, January 27 2020 – The federal government spent over $11.9 billion on management consultants, temporary help contractors and IT consultants between 2011 and 2018 to do the work that could have been done by Canada’s own public service professionals. The contracts ended up costing the public twice their original price.

Shockingly, spending on IT consultants more than doubled – from $605 million in 2011 to over $1.3 billion in 2018 – totalling $8.5 billion in that time period. Seven out of every ten dollars spent on outsourcing is spent on IT consultants. 

“These figures are staggering. The government is choosing to pay more for lower quality services for Canadians,” said PIPSC President, Debi Daviau. “The highest quality, most efficient and least expensive expertise already exists within the public service. Instead of relying on the best public service professionals in the world, the government is wasting Canadians’ money on overpriced contractors.”

Over the years, IT consultants have shifted from serving as a temporary replacement or offering specialized skills to delivering a large share of fundamental IT functions. Outsourcing has eroded institutional knowledge, skills and expertise from the public service.

“Enough is enough. It should be easier to hire and train public servants than to pay a shadow public service that ends up costing twice as much originally expected,” said Daviau. “It’s time for the federal government to reduce outsourcing, as promised by the Liberal government in 2015, and to increase requirements for outsourcing.”

The Phoenix pay system best illustrates how fast costs can spiral out of control when an outsourced IT project goes wrong.

“Canadians cannot afford one more failed outsourced IT project like Phoenix. Billions of dollars can be saved if we invest in public servants. Those savings can be spent on projects that will make lives better for Canadians,” added President Daviau.

PIPSC will expand its fight against outsourcing by advocating for changes to staffing in the public service, reviewing the new direction on staffing, expanding the pilots designed to expedite staffing and finding new training opportunities for its members.

“The public services we rely on every single day are at risk of cuts and privatization. Each one of us has a stake in this fight against outsourcing,” said Daviau.

The full report, The real cost of outsourcing, is available here: https://pipsc.ca/news-issues/outsourcing/part-one-real-cost-outsourcing

The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada represents 60,000 public service professionals across Canada. Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

-30-

For further information: Johanne Fillion, 613-228-6310, ext 4953 or 613-883-4900 (cell), jfillion@pipsc.ca

Government outsourcing, especially outsourcing IT personnel, is costing Canadians billions of dollars each year. From time to time, outsourcing may be necessary to augment staff compliments or bring in external skills and expertise.^[1] But years of unchecked spending on outsourcing has created a shadow public service of consultants operating alongside the government workforce. This shadow public service plays by an entirely different set of rules: they are not hired based on merit, representation, fairness or transparency; they are not subject to budget restraints or hiring freezes; and they are not accountable to the Canadian public.^[2] It’s time for a major shift in outsourcing policy in the federal public service.

Over the course of 2020, PIPSC will release a series of investigative reports unpacking the government’s growing reliance on outsourcing and its true costs. 

Part one: The real cost of outsourcing

Government work, traditionally done by public servants, is increasingly being done by external consultants and contractors at a cost that should shock Canadians. Rather than investing in public servants, government budgets are earmarked for hiring outsourced personnel. Not only are these consultants expensive, the contracts are awarded to corporations that underbid while the actual cost skyrockets. Yet, year over year, the Government continues to make the costly decision to outsource. The majority of IT outsourcing funds are spent by the top ten worst offender departments and agencies in government, raising concerns that departments and agencies are losing the knowledge and skills required to deliver key services. But the problem is pervasive and is growing rapidly across all other government departments and agencies. When you follow where all this money is going – you find a paper trail leading to multinational corporations. Canadians should be aware of how their money is being spent and the true costs of such short-sightedness. 

Reliance on personnel outsourcing has more than doubled

Between 2011 and 2018, the federal government outsourced over $11.9 billion in work to IT consultants, management consultants and temporary help contractors. During that same time period, the annual price tag for personnel outsourcing doubled – from just $1 billion in 2011 to nearly $2.2 billion in 2018. 

Spending on IT consultants has more than doubled – from $605 million in 2011 to over $1.3 billion in 2018 – totalling more than $8.5 billion. 

IT consultants are intended to augment staff or to provide specialized skills under certain circumstances. However, a twofold increase in IT outsourcing in just seven years suggests that managers are inappropriately using consultants to deliver a larger share of fundamental IT functions required by the government to deliver services.

Reliance on IT outsourcing is concentrated in 10 departments and agencies 

Just 10 of 78 federal government organizations account for nearly 73 percent of the $8.5 billion spent on IT consultants. Five departments and agencies account for nearly half, 49 percent, of the total spent on IT consultants.

Outsourcing in the top departments and agencies is a serious barrier to developing internal capacity. As more and more IT functions are outsourced to consultants, expertise and knowledge of government IT systems are moved outside of the public service. Since there are no mechanisms to transfer knowledge and expertise back to the departments and agencies after a project is finished, the public service is starved of the ability to provide a growing number of IT functions internally. This reliance on IT consultants is a cause for concern for the public service and the Canadians who rely on public services.

Learn more about the symptoms of IT outsourcing including knowledge loss and the transfer of skills.

Outsourcing has grown rapidly across the government

Despite the concentration of IT outsourcing spending in the top ten departments and agencies, IT outsourcing is growing at an even faster pace in the rest of the government. In 2011, the top ten outsourcing departments accounted for 96 percent of all IT outsourcing in the government. In 2018, the top ten share of all IT outsourcing fell to about 71 percent. In other words, where government outsourcing was once almost completely concentrated in a handful of government departments and agencies, it is now spreading across the entire government.

IT outsourcing increased 5.5 times faster than department payrolls 

Government departments showed a clear preference for outsourcing over investing in staff. IT outsourcing budgets more than doubled while payrolls and operating budgets barely kept pace with inflation.^[3] IT outsourcing increased 5.5 times faster than payrolls and nearly 10 times faster than the total departmental spending. 

The disproportionate growth in IT outsourcing illustrates a shift in how the government delivers services. Traditionally, the government relied on its internal employees with a small complement of consultants to deliver services. As the need for services increased, the government would hire more internal staff. Now, the departments are increasingly turning to consultants to do a growing share of the ever-expanding work required of the public service. In other words, instead of hiring more internal staff, more-and-more of the relatively constant budgets of departments and agencies are being used to outsource IT consultants. 

Sticker shock

IT consultants end up costing the federal government, and in turn Canadians, more than twice as much as expected. On average, the final cost of an IT consultant is more than double the cost of the original contract – far higher than the average mark-up of two-thirds for a management consultant or temporary help contractor. 

The reason these contracts cost significantly more than their initial value is twofold:

• Government managers have significant flexibility to modify contracts after they have been signed. The value of contracts can be increased by as much as 50 percent without having to be re-tendered.^[4]

   

• The discretion to modify contracts pushes contractors to become ‘loss-leaders.’ Corporations win contracts with low bids that do not cover the cost to deliver a service – also known as “suicide bidding.” The loss-leader can then squeeze out profits through revisions once the contract is signed. 

It is no surprise that contractors under-estimate costs and that as a project develops the scope and budget swells. However, year over year the decision-makers seem to ignore these ballooning costs and allow budgets to overrun. 

Learn which corporations Canadians overpay.

Better digital capacity and services for Canadians

There is a real-world cost to outsourcing – look at the human cost of Phoenix. A project doomed from the start that is costing taxpayers billions of dollars. The government continues to throw good money after bad while the livelihoods of public servants are at stake. Prime Minister Trudeau, in his 2019 ministerial mandate letters, directed cabinet to “raise the bar on openness, effectiveness and transparency in government” and build “better digital capacity and services for Canadians.”^[5] To succeed in this, the government needs to invest in a highly trained, cutting-edge public service to deliver the next generation of digital services rather than further entrench itself in an unhealthy reliance on IT consultants. 

Read PIPSC’s policy recommendations to stop outsourcing and build an open, effective and transparent public service.

Stay tuned as we release our series of reports outlining the real costs and symptoms of government outsourcing. Our second report will focus on how outsourcing is not only made convenient for management but erodes government staffing values including transparency, accountability, merit and representation (gender, region, ethnicity and bilingualism) by bypassing the staffing system.

[2] David, McDonald. The Shadow Public Service. The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. 2011.
[3] According to Statistics Canada, CPI inflation between 2011 and 2018 was 11.3%. Table: 18-10-0005-01 (formerly CANSIM 326-0021).
[4] David McDonald, The Shadow Public Service The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. P.12. 2011.  
[5] Office of the Prime Minister. Minister of Digital Government Mandate Letter. December 2019. Retrieved from: https://pm.gc.ca/en/mandate-letters/minister-digital-government-mandate-letter

The implementation of new collective agreements is underway for the AV, NR, RE, SH, SP, AFS (CRA), NRC (IS, LS, RO-RCO, TR), NEB, NFB, NUREG (CNSC) and OSFI groups.

This webinar video outlines the details of your pay increase and the tips for calculating retro pay. You will also find useful information about implementation timelines and the penalties for the employer if these timelines are not met.

The webinar presentation is available in English and French.

We expect a large number of members have already received their pay increases. After that process is complete, your employer can start calculating and distributing retro pay over the coming weeks and months.

Information on the timelines specific to your group are available in our FAQs.

We're proud to join eleven Ontario unions representing more than 250,000 provincial public sector employees in a coordinated Charter challenge against Bill 124.

“Bill 124 is a direct attack on our members and on workers’ rights in Ontario,” said President Debi Daviau. “We will fight this law and the dangerous precedent it sets for labour rights in our country.”
 
Bill 124, euphemistically named the Protecting a Sustainable Public Sector for Future Generations Act, violates the Charter-protected right to free and fair collective bargaining. It allows the provincial government to impose salary caps, including for pensions and benefits, on a variety of unionized and non-unionized public sector workplaces.

Workers affected by Bill 124 include those employed by the provincial government, crown agencies, school boards, universities and colleges, hospitals, non-profit long-term care homes, children’s aid societies, social service agencies and the electricity and energy sectors. This includes PIPSC members in the following groups: 

• Ontario Medical Physicists (MP)
• Sunnybook Mechanical and Electronic Technologists (SUN-MET)
• Sunnybrook Radiation Therapists (SUN-RT)
• Radiation Therapists - Juravinski Cancer Centre (JCC)
• Radiation Therapist - Thunder Bay Regional (TBH-RT)
• Windsor Radiation Therapists (WRH-RT)
• University of Ottawa IT Professionals (UOITP)

Labour leaders in Ontario are determined to see an end to Bill 124.

The Ontario Labour movement, with the Power of Many, will be initiating a public campaign to repeal Bill 124.

The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL) is leading the charge. “The OFL stands in solidarity with the education unions that have recently launched their challenges to the application of Bill 124 in the education sector, as we escalate the opposition to this government’s continued attack on the Charter rights of all Ontarians. Together, we are launching an aggressive campaign to demand the Ford Conservatives repeal this unconstitutional legislation,” said Patty Coates, OFL President.

“This challenge is about defending workers’ rights protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” stated CUPE Ontario President Fred Hahn. “When the Ford Conservatives demand that we must all do our part, instead of targeting working people the government should be taxing profitable corporations and the wealthiest in our communities. Charter rights matter, human rights matter, workers’ rights matter.”
 
“For workers in equity-seeking groups – racialized workers, workers with a disability, Indigenous workers, and women, collective agreements are essential to ensuring fairness in the workplace,” said Sharleen Stewart, President of SEIU Healthcare. “For the government to set limits on bargaining undermines the rights of workers who already face systemic discrimination across the board.”
 
In recent years, unions have successfully coordinated together to challenge legislation that violates workers’ rights, such as the Liberals’ Bill 115, which interfered with collective bargaining in the education sector. The courts ruled that Bill 115 violated workers’ Charter rights. In the face of legal challenges, a coordinated resistance campaign, and public opposition, the bill was repealed.

The joint Charter challenge announced today is being brought by a coalition of public and private sector unions that represent workers across the broader public sector, including:

• Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE)
• Service Employees International Union (SEIU Healthcare)
• United Steelworkers (USW)
• Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC)
• Society of United Professionals (IFPTE) Local 160
• Canadian Office and Professional Employees Union (COPE Ontario)
• AMAPCEO
• International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
• Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC)
• United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 175
• Ontario Nurses Association (ONA)

Additional unions and organizations representing public sector workers in Ontario are expected to join this coordinated challenge or pursue their own separate legal challenges to Bill 124 in the coming weeks.