Letter to Canadian Heritage Minister Rodriguez about insufficient NFB funding

The Honourable Pablo Rodriguez, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Canadian Heritage
15 Eddy Street, 12th Floor
Gatineau, QuebecK1A 0M5
By email: hon.pablo.rodriguez@pch.gc.ca

May 9, 2022

Dear Minister Rodriguez,

On behalf of the National Film Board of Canada (NFB) employees represented by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC), I am writing today to express my grave concerns over the clearly insufficient resources allocated to the NFB in the latest federal budget.

The government doesn't seem to be increasing the NFB'S funding to match inflation, and appears to still be clawing back funds from its operating budget to repay expenses related to its recent move to modern new facilities in downtown Montreal.

As the country’s public film producer and distributor, the National Film Board of Canada (NFB) is an invaluable resource to all Canadians. Its filmmakers develop content of the highest quality and to continue with its important work, the NFB requires stable, predictable funding to keep up with the private sector and rising costs.

The NFB’s operating budget has been stretched thin over recent years - and the extra $15 million in costs incurred to move its facilities is putting even more pressure on it. These extra expenses must be adequately supported by the federal government. It is unacceptable that the latter is asking the NFB to reimburse it for these expenses while not adequately increasing its budget.

When we consider all of these issues, the funding for the NFB is at a 20-year low. As the Minister Responsible, how will you ensure that the organization has the resources it needs to continue producing essential Canadian content?

I have asked my staff to contact your office to request a meeting to discuss these issues. I look forward to your response, and remain

Sincerely Yours,

Jennifer Carr
President, Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada


6 October 2017
Radio-Canada and the CBC have reported this week that Phoenix was “doomed from the start.” The reason? The business case prepared in 2009 under the previous government “lacked proper risk analysis and was politically motivated.” In the words of former parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page, “You look at this business case, you can drive trucks through some of the holes under the risk analysis.”

3 October 2017
In light of the Phoenix fiasco and as part of a commitment made to bargaining agents to make it easier for their members to obtain information about their pay, Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSCPC) has just released its Pay Bulletin for September.

2 October 2017
The Institute has just filed two new policy grievances on Phoenix-related issues, accusing the Treasury Board of failing to implement the terms of the AV and SP Group collective agreements within the specified timeframe (120 and 90 days respectively).

29 September 2017
While much has been reported about the impact of the Phoenix pay system on current federal employees, comparatively little has been said about the harm done to retirees.

21 July 2017
Recently, I sent an opinion piece to the Globe and Mail about our members’ ongoing problems with the Phoenix pay system and what I consider to be one of the root causes of the debacle: outsourcing.

12 June 2017
The recent recommendations of yet another consultants’ report on Shared Services Canada (SSC) demonstrate that, when it comes to federal government outsourcing, there’s no shortage of private sector advice.