The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada
The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada
Log in

PIPSC National Election Procedures

To support and implement PIPSC Bylaw 22.3.3

Officer and Regional Director positions will use the British Columbia Single Transferrable Vote (BC STV), as described in the BC Citizens Council Technical Report of December 2004.

Officer and Regional Director positions shall be elected using a STV ballot. The ballot shall allow voters to rank a number of choices in order of preference equal to the total number of candidates for each office; A voter may rank less than the total allowed. Counting will be based upon the rules proposed by the BC Citizens Council Technical Report of December 2004

  1. For the purposes of this section: (1) a candidate shall be deemed "continuing" if the candidate has not been eliminated; (2) a ballot shall be deemed "continuing" if it is not exhausted; and (3) a ballot shall be deemed "exhausted," and not counted in further stages of the tabulation, if all of the choices have been eliminated or there are no more choices indicated on the ballot. If a ballot gives equal rank to two or more candidates, the ballot shall be declared exhausted when such multiple rankings are reached. If a voter skips a rank, the voter's vote shall be transferred to that voter's next ranked choice.
  2. Once the total number of valid ballots is established in each multi-seat position, the minimum number of votes required for a candidate to be elected is calculated using the Droop quota formula.the total number of votes received by the elected candidate divided by the sum of one and the number of seats to be elected, result plus one
    Fractions are ignored.
  3. All ballots are counted and each ballot is allocated as a vote to the candidate against whose name a first preference (i.e., “1”) is shown on the ballot.
  4. If a candidate(s) on the first count has a number of first preference votes exactly equal to the minimum number of votes needed to be elected, then that candidate(s) is declared elected and the counted ballots indicating that candidate(s) as a first preference are put aside and the other preferences recorded on the ballots are not examined.
  5. The method of distributing surplus votes from those candidates with more than the minimum number of votes needed to be elected will be the "Weighted Inclusive Gregory method”, as follows.
  6. If a candidate on the first count gains more than the minimum number of votes needed to be elected, the candidate is declared elected, and the number of votes in excess of the number of votes needed to be elected (the surplus) is recorded. All of the elected candidate’s ballots are then re- examined and assigned to candidates not yet elected according to the second preferences marked on the ballots of those who gave a first preference vote to the elected candidate. These votes are allocated according to a “transfer value.” The formula for the transfer value is:surplus votes cast for the elected candidate divided by total number of votes received by the elected candidate

     

  7. If two or more candidates on the first count gain more than the minimum number of votes needed to be elected, all of those candidates are declared elected. The ballots of the candidate with the largest number of first preference votes will be re-examined first and assigned (at the transfer value) to candidates not yet elected according to the second preferences marked on that candidate’s ballots, or the next available preference, if the second preference candidate has already been elected. The ballots of the other elected candidate(s) will then be re-examined and their surpluses distributed in order according to the number of first preference votes each candidate received.
  8. If a candidate reaches more than the minimum number of votes needed to be elected as the consequence of a transfer of votes from an elected candidate, the number of votes in excess of the number of votes needed to be elected (the surplus) will be transferred to other candidates. This transfer will be to the next available preference shown on all of this candidate’s ballots. These ballots now include 1) the candidate’s first preference ballots, and 2) the parcel(s) of ballots transferred to the candidate from one or more elected candidates. The transfer value for the candidate’s first preference ballots is:surplus votes cast for the elected candidate divided by total number of votes received by the elected candidate

    The transfer value for each parcel of ballots transferred to the candidate from one or more elected candidates is:

    Surplus votes cast for the elected candidate divided by the total number of votes received by the elected candidate, result multiplied by the transfer value of the parcel of ballots received by the candidate
  9. If no candidate has a number of votes equal to or greater than the minimum number of votes needed to be elected, the candidate with the smallest number of votes is excluded. All of that candidate’s ballots—both first preference ballots and any parcel or parcels of ballots transferred from other candidates—are transferred to candidates who have not been elected or excluded according to the next available preference shown on the excluded candidate’s ballots. The excluded candidate’s first preference ballots are transferred to the second (or next available) preferences at full value. Ballots received from previously-elected (or excluded) candidates are transferred at the transfer value at which the ballots were received.
  10. Counting continues in the described sequence: the surplus of elected candidates is assigned until no more candidates are elected, then the ballots of excluded candidates are assigned until another candidate is elected. When all but one of the candidates to be elected have been elected, and only two candidates remain in the count, the candidate with the most votes is declared elected, even though the candidate may not have reached the minimum number of votes (the quota) needed to be elected.
  11. If, during the transfer of preferences, a ballot does not indicate an available preference, the ballot is put aside as “exhausted.” This can occur because:
    • the voter only indicated one, or a small number of preferences;
    • all the preferred candidates have already been elected or excluded; or
    • there are repetitions on the ballot in the sequence of numbering preferences.
  12. Where two or more candidates have the same number of first preference votes at the end of the first count, and this number is more than the minimum number of votes necessary for election, then the candidate whose surplus is distributed first will be decided randomly by computer.
  13. Where no candidate has a number of first preference votes equal to or greater than the number of votes necessary for election at the end of the first count, and two or more candidates have the same number of first preference votes, this number being the smallest number of first preference votes gained by any candidate, then the candidate who is excluded first will be decided randomly by computer.
  14. If, at any stage of the count other than during the first count, two candidates have the same number of votes, the candidate who is declared elected first, or who is not excluded will be:
    • the candidate with the larger number of votes in the previous or immediately next preceding count where there is a difference in the votes between the two candidates; or
    • the candidate whose name is decided randomly by computer, where there is no difference in the number of votes between the candidates at any preceding count.
Published on 1 February 2015