Sponsored by Dmitry Gorodnichy
Whereas recent legal precedents have highlighted the critical importance of upholding individual Charter freedoms, as demonstrated by the Alberta Court’s decision to strike down public health orders that violated these cherished rights
Whereas recent events within the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) prompted a review of the CAF’s COVID-19 vaccination policy, revealing concerns about non consensual medical experimentation that impacts fundamental freedoms. These concerns center around the right to liberty and security of the person, protected under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This review resulted in the conclusion that the grievers’ rights protected under section 7 were infringed and that the disputed provisions of the CAF vaccination policy are unconstitutional and therefore invalid.
Whereas the integrity of ethical medical practices is paramount, exemplified by the withdrawal of professional misconduct accusations against a nurse who courageously disclosed instances of vaccination injuries stemming from mass Covid-19 vaccination clinics, including cases necessitating multiple ambulance responses;
Whereas serious medical conditions have been associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, including blood clotting disorders, cardiac emergencies, myocarditis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, autoimmune disease, spontaneous miscarriages, neurological system disorders and much more; (VAERS reports and Public Health Agency of Canada ATIP request available upon request)
Whereas it has been distressingly reported that at least one tragic suicide occurred due to a refusal for accommodation in the context of these mandates;
Whereas the principle of informed consent is fundamental to ethical medical practice and respects the autonomy of patients. Transparency and informed decision-making are essential to safeguard public health, underscoring concerns arising from the revelation that the CDC acknowledged their vaccine’s limitations in preventing transmission, and Pfizer’s omission of comprehensive testing regarding transmission cessation, leading to critical information being withheld from the public, including known adverse events.
Whereas this resolution was proposed last year for the discussion at the National AGM 2023 but was never discussed, and the issue remained;
Therefore be it resolved that an Employee Medical Treatment and Ethical Refusal Protection Policy be promptly established within the framework of this union, aimed at robustly safeguarding the rights of unionized employees concerning medical treatments.
Be it further resolved that this Policy comprehensively safeguards the rights of unionized employees and vehemently prevents any form of discriminatory or punitive actions associated with the refusal of any medical treatments.
Be it also resolved that the primary and overarching objective of this Policy is to steadfastly prevent further harm inflicted by unethical mandates, ensuring the promotion of ethical medical practices and the preservation of individual autonomy.
And be it finally resolved that this resolution shall take immediate effect upon approval and shall be disseminated throughout the union, encompassing all members and stakeholders, as a clear commitment to the well-being and ethical principles of our workforce as defined by the union Mandate and Values.
Section I: Right to Refuse Medical Treatments
Every unionized employee has the unequivocal right to refuse any form of medical treatment, including vaccines and other medical procedures, without exception. This right shall be upheld without fear of reprisal, discrimination, suspension, termination, or any negative impact on employment status.
The union shall advocate for and protect the individual’s right to make decisions about medical treatments in accordance with their religious and ethical beliefs. The union shall stand firm against any attempts to coerce, pressure, or enforce medical treatments against an employee’s will.
Section II: Preventing Embarrassment and Punitive Actions
The union and the employer shall collaborate to establish mechanisms that ensure unionized employees are not subjected to uncomfortable or embarrassing situations due to their religious or ethical refusals of medical treatments. This may encompass maintaining confidentiality, providing alternative work arrangements, and facilitating open channels of communication.
The union shall actively intervene and oppose any punitive measures directed at unionized employees who choose to refuse medical treatments. The union shall engage in every effort to avert penalties, sanctions, or any adverse consequences arising from such refusals.
Section III: Communication and Education
The union and the employer shall jointly communicate and educate unionized employees about their unwavering rights to decline medical treatments, underscored by the safeguards provided under this Policy. This information shall be conveyed through accessible means and in both official languages.
The union shall undertake educational initiatives aimed at raising awareness among its members and leadership about the significance of respecting colleagues’ ethical refusals. The union shall strive to nurture an inclusive and empathetic work culture that reveres diverse beliefs and values.
Section IV: Union Support for Affected Employees
In the event that an employee faces adverse consequences or retaliation due to their refusal of medical treatments, the union shall provide unwavering support and advocacy. The union commits to utilizing its resources, expertise, and collective bargaining power to ensure the affected employee’s rights are upheld and their interests safeguarded.
This resolution shall take immediate effect upon approval and shall be disseminated throughout the union, encompassing all members and stakeholders. The primary aim of this Policy is to solidify the protection of religious and ethical refusals of medical treatments within the unionized workforce, promoting a harmonious and equitable workplace.
RSC: No Comment